<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Home on Edward J. Edmonds</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/</link><description>Recent content in Home on Edward J. Edmonds</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://edwardjedmonds.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Merchants of Doubt</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/merchants-of-doubt/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/merchants-of-doubt/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s a structural reason the American economy runs on two layers. I want to walk through that structure, because it explains something important about how distrust of expertise gets manufactured—and what happens when it succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first layer is built by experts. Engineers design bridges that hold. Oncologists develop chemotherapy protocols that extend life. Epidemiologists track disease vectors. Regulatory scientists test whether the food you eat will kill you. This layer is boring, credentialed, and accountable. It produces things that work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hormetic Endocrinology</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/hormetic-endocrinology/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/hormetic-endocrinology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Orthodox endocrinology treats hormone replacement as a problem of restoration: levels are low, so we raise them; the target is a steady state within reference ranges. This framing has served medicine well for hypothyroidism and hypogonadism alike. But it leaves unexplored a different question—whether strategic, cyclical perturbation of hormonal systems might produce adaptations that static replacement cannot. What I want to do here is construct a theoretical framework for that question, grounded in what the literature actually supports, honest about where speculation begins, and structured enough to generate falsifiable predictions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Consolidation Amplifiers</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/consolidation-amplifiers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/consolidation-amplifiers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a previous essay, I outlined a framework for thinking about pulsed androgen-thyroid synergy—the idea that strategic, cyclical perturbation of hormonal systems might produce adaptations that static replacement cannot. The model posited two axes: velocity (metabolic and neural throughput, set primarily by thyroid hormone) and stability (structural buffering, provided by androgen signaling). Training in the zone where velocity slightly exceeds stability forces adaptation; too much velocity without proportional stability produces brittle, non-retained gains.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essential Architecture</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/essential-architecture/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/essential-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a previous essay, I described polyunsaturated fatty acids as respiratory inhibitors—compounds that damage cardiolipin, poison cytochrome c oxidase, and can induce a torpor-like metabolic state. This essay goes deeper into that story, exploring a distinction that determines when those mechanisms activate and when they don’t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building materials and fuel are not the same thing.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You don’t burn lumber to heat your house while your walls are falling down. You don’t metabolize muscle protein for energy while trying to get stronger. And you shouldn’t be oxidizing polyunsaturated fatty acids in your mitochondria when those same fatty acids are essential structural components of every membrane in your body.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Systems at the Edge</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/systems-at-the-edge/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/systems-at-the-edge/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The previous four essays in this series developed a framework for thinking about adaptive physiology—velocity, stability, signal quality, consolidation, form. But somewhere along the way, I started noticing the same patterns everywhere. The concepts aren’t specific to endocrinology. They’re specific to complex adaptive systems in general.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This essay is an attempt to unpack that intuition. I want to see whether the framework scales—whether velocity, stability, and form are useful lenses for thinking about organizations, learning, cities, relationships, and other systems that have nothing to do with thyroid hormone or testosterone.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Integrated System</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/the-integrated-system/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/the-integrated-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The previous three essays—Hormetic Endocrinology, Consolidation Amplifiers, and Thyroid Hormone as the Guardian of Form—each took a different angle on the same underlying system. The first asked whether cycling hormones might produce adaptations that steady-state replacement can’t. The second asked what makes those adaptations stick. The third went deeper into what T3 actually does at a thermodynamic level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This essay is about how the pieces fit together. Velocity, stability, form, and consolidation aren’t separate ideas—they’re components of one system. And when you treat them that way, you get predictions that no single piece would generate on its own.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thyroid Hormone as the Guardian of Form</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/thyroid-hormone-guardian-of-form/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/thyroid-hormone-guardian-of-form/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-thermodynamic-imperative"&gt;The Thermodynamic Imperative&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Orthodox endocrinology frames thyroid regulation through the lens of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid axis—a homeostatic feedback loop where TSH serves as the master regulator, keeping circulating T4 and T3 within statistical reference ranges. This model has clinical utility. It generates treatment protocols. But it increasingly fails to account for observations that don’t fit: the paradox of centenarians with &lt;em&gt;low&lt;/em&gt; T3 outliving their euthyroid peers, the metabolic stasis of hibernating mammals, or the catastrophic symptoms reported by individuals on restrictive diets whose bloodwork looks entirely “normal.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Architecture Fails</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/when-architecture-fails/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/when-architecture-fails/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s a chemical reason you can’t build a membrane out of saturated fat. I want to walk through that chemistry, because it explains something important about why essential fatty acids are essential—and what happens when they’re missing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Saturated fatty acids are chemically complete. Every carbon is bonded to its maximum number of hydrogens. No double bonds. No kinks. No electron-rich regions. They’re inert hydrocarbon chains that stack together like logs—stable, energetically dense, and utterly uninteresting from an architectural standpoint.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>About</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/about/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/about/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For more than twenty years my work was to make tissue legible—to fix, cut, and stain it so
that what mattered could be seen. Which is really to say I spent two decades learning how
easily observation can be manufactured, and what it takes to trust what you see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Histotechnology is a discipline of preparation. Nothing under the microscope is raw; every
image is the product of how the sample was fixed, processed, and stained. A careless step
upstream produces an artifact that looks exactly like a finding. So the first thing the work
teaches is a specific, durable skepticism: &lt;em&gt;before asking what a result means, ask how it was
made.&lt;/em&gt; That question—is this signal, or an artifact of the method?—is the one I bring to
almost everything I read now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Contact</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/contact/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/contact/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For questions, corrections, or correspondence about the essays here, email is best. I read
everything, though I can&amp;rsquo;t always reply quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="email-cta"&gt;&lt;a class="email-link btn" data-email="ZWR3YXJkLmVkbW9uZHNAZ21haWwuY29t" href="#" rel="nofollow"&gt;Email me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;span class="email-fallback"&gt;Email: edward.edmonds&lt;span aria-hidden="true"&gt; [at] &lt;/span&gt;gmail.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;style&gt;.email-link{display:none}&lt;/style&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;
&lt;script&gt;
(function(){var ls=document.querySelectorAll('a.email-link[data-email]');for(var i=0;i&lt;ls.length;i++){var a=ls[i],e=atob(a.getAttribute('data-email'));a.href='mailto:'+e;a.setAttribute('title',e);a.removeAttribute('data-email');}})();
&lt;/script&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My work and the source for this site also live on
&lt;a href="https://github.com/deths74r"&gt;GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>