<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Endocrinology on Edward J. Edmonds</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/tags/endocrinology/</link><description>Recent content in Endocrinology on Edward J. Edmonds</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://edwardjedmonds.com/tags/endocrinology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Hormetic Endocrinology</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/hormetic-endocrinology/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/hormetic-endocrinology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Orthodox endocrinology treats hormone replacement as a problem of restoration: levels are low, so we raise them; the target is a steady state within reference ranges. This framing has served medicine well for hypothyroidism and hypogonadism alike. But it leaves unexplored a different question—whether strategic, cyclical perturbation of hormonal systems might produce adaptations that static replacement cannot. What I want to do here is construct a theoretical framework for that question, grounded in what the literature actually supports, honest about where speculation begins, and structured enough to generate falsifiable predictions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thyroid Hormone as the Guardian of Form</title><link>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/thyroid-hormone-guardian-of-form/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://edwardjedmonds.com/essays/thyroid-hormone-guardian-of-form/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-thermodynamic-imperative"&gt;The Thermodynamic Imperative&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Orthodox endocrinology frames thyroid regulation through the lens of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid axis—a homeostatic feedback loop where TSH serves as the master regulator, keeping circulating T4 and T3 within statistical reference ranges. This model has clinical utility. It generates treatment protocols. But it increasingly fails to account for observations that don’t fit: the paradox of centenarians with &lt;em&gt;low&lt;/em&gt; T3 outliving their euthyroid peers, the metabolic stasis of hibernating mammals, or the catastrophic symptoms reported by individuals on restrictive diets whose bloodwork looks entirely “normal.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>